Oracle and Google lawsuit so that the entire technology industry jittery

In this coming Monday, a US jury trial date will be on between Oracle and Google (microblogging) hearing play Baby Games the closing arguments. Recently, Oracle accused Google Android to claims of infringement regarding the $ 9 billion, so that the entire technology industry nervous. Oracle alleges that Google will at some of the key Java technology integrated into the Android operating system, a move that violated Oracle's patents. Now, Android system on the market has been sold smart phones, account for approximately 80% share. Of course, Google in its defense claimed that the company has been in the "fair use." This time the dispute Oracle and Google, the core difference between the two sides recognize that the problem still exists in the "open" areas, is both fundamental conflict in this culture. Open source software is no copyright issues, it can be used for any user to obtain such software free of charge. Open source software is the central pillar of industry, a large number of developers and businesses rely largely open. Even since a very long time been opposed to the open policy of Microsoft, now also changed his attitude, began to support the open source policy. However, no matter what the jury verdict, Google and Oracle's such a dispute may be the way to build software and marketing have a huge impact, even undermine a central pillar of the software industry - the "open source" policy . What is open: As a former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer (Steve Ballmer) said, the core concept of open source something like "communism" in this policy, including Google, Netflix and Apple and other companies, including employees the developer will be developed to the world to share their software code. In return, these initial developers in other developers improve after the software, but also they should be able to obtain the corresponding improvement method, in order to benefit. If you live long enough and open person, then you will certainly hear the words - "all of us better than any one of us smarter," because play Dog Games a successful open-source projects tend to have dozens, hundreds or even thousands of programmers from different angles to improve the same code, so, this developed software will get better and better, the speed will be faster, much better than any of the patent Tool of. This is why open source policy by many technology companies welcome reasons, these technology companies find themselves forced to accelerate the development and updating their products, or their products will soon be weary consumers, they must finish before consumers tired of their products and innovation. For example, the use of open Mesos Apple software to manage the large number of requests Siri receive each day. Mesos originally developed by Twitter is a tool for advocacy and Airbnb. In addition, for businesses, especially start-ups, access to open source software, and serves as the foundation of their actual sales of commercial products, which is extremely common fact. Open means opportunity, can help companies reduce duplication of investment, which will create more focus for a variety of products. For example, Google wrote in a 2003 scientific paper became the origin of Yahoo launched in 2006 Hadoop data analysis software. When Yahoo Hadoop as open source product launch, which became the basis of a series of popular technology start-up companies, among them many of them as startups Hortonworks, Cloudera and Platfora the like. Next, let us go back to Oracle's dispute with Google. Trouble Google Where: Related litigation testimony to showcase the whole incident. Google initially in 2005 and 2006, the first to create an Android product, when Google already know that Apple is building something good, which is later iPhone smartphone. In order to quickly launch its own operating system, Google decided not to build its own scattered some key components, but the direct use of Java technology - a technology has been more mature, and it was about to become a lot of Android app developers engineers are familiar with. Alphabet Group, the former chairman and Google CEO Eric Schmidt (Eric Schmidt) confirmed that in this case, when he had been to the Sun (that is,play Cat Games Java technology, the initial developer, and now the company has Oracle arm), trying to agree to Java to pay patent fees of $ 30 million to 40 million US dollars in exchange for the use of Java technology in the Android system, but then, that the negotiations failed, the reason is Sun's fears will therefore lose their mobile control of the area. Google co-founder Larry Page (Larry Page), said in testimony, Google does use some of the Java technology in Android system, but did not say "they think only Sun the company was entitled to receive royalties." However, Page said Google has been able to use Java technology, because this is an open technology. Android co-founder Andy Rubin (Andy Rubin) also confirmed that Google believes that part of the Java technology they use is not infringing. At first, Google has claimed that Oracle did not get APIs (application programming interfaces) copyright. APIs allow software and Web sites with each other "dialogue." However, after a judgment of the Court ruling, in accordance with the provisions of the law, part of the program Google used Oracle's patented product is in fact, Oracle's intellectual property. Therefore, today's Google resorting to "fair use" defense, acknowledged that Oracle owns the copyright on Java technology, but claimed that Google should be permitted to use these programs in a commercial mode. The implication: If Google's fair use defense is invalid, then the technology industry which will open a shocking precedent. Open a large number of technology companies respected the way. Oracle raised the issue of the API procedure is a technology that allows the use of a large number of technology companies in the software the way, this is not very common, but it is the closest. Google may oppose the ruling would mean, like Oracle, this mature technology companies to find a new source of revenue: the look for those start-ups and developers using Java or other techniques, ask them for patent indemnification. If Google can not be defended successfully, then any other companies have had such encounters would not have any luck. There is no doubt that this innovative software play Girl Games industry is certainly not good news. The thrust is to open free open communication and collaboration. If developers fear they might be sued, then the next best open source software project probably would never appear.